A US bureaucrat identifies a dangerous person and decides he (or she) should be killed. Which now is worse?
1) An assassin paid by the USA infiltrates the target's neighborhood and suddenly kills the target.
( alternately: )
2) The USA uses an aerial drone to bomb the target's home, killing the target, and others in the home, and also some neighbors.
Why should either option be OK?
Perhaps both are being used now...
1) An assassin paid by the USA infiltrates the target's neighborhood and suddenly kills the target.
( alternately: )
2) The USA uses an aerial drone to bomb the target's home, killing the target, and others in the home, and also some neighbors.
Why should either option be OK?
Perhaps both are being used now...
