Will Hillary Clinton's speeches to Goldman Sachs
poison her candidacy?
In 2013, Clinton spoke at three Goldman Sachs events for US$675,000.
Former Senator Hillary Clinton still claims solidarity with working folk & asserts (
link):
"I did stand up to the banks. I did make it clear that their behavior would not be excused."
Seth Abramson writes (link) that if we saw Clinton's Goldman Sachs speech transcripts, "
it could end her candidacy for president."
Goldmangate !
Assorted transcripts & tapes of other Clinton speeches now pepper the internet. But the three Goldman talks (reportedly each an hour-long, @ $225,000 each) were "private" sessions not open to the public. Nice work if you can get it -- but surely not a working class wage.
Major problem is seeking to hide the fact she's
highly-corporatist.
Worse for Clinton, the financial services industry is belatedly under huge negative attack from the Panama Papers, Oxfam ("
Broken at the Top" -
link), and the Bernie Sanders campaign. Self-regulation by Big Business is a dirty joke, considering Enron, the four Trump business bankruptcies, disastrous
corporate-led trade agreements (TPP, TTIP), and public bailout of private firms. Now Americans wake up to the rude fact they've heavily subsidized top businesspeople. Surely the Clintons , who've l
ived top of the world now for 25 years, poorly represent typical citizens. They work hard, but protect the backs of big finance, the banking industry, etc. Hillary's big-money endorsements and coziness with big financiers show she herself is a wealthy oligarch -- no time to befriend the common man, and a tough sell when
full-time work doesn't pay a living wage.